mesothelioma settlement amounts mesothelioma settlements firm law mesothelioma mesothelioma law firms average mesothelioma settlement amount mesothelioma lawsuits settlements mesothelioma lawsuit mesothelioma lawsuits mesothelioma lawyer california mesothelioma lawyer san diego mesothelioma lawyer houston mesothelioma lawyer lawyers for mesothelioma
Showing posts with label Settlement Amounts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Settlement Amounts. Show all posts

Mesothelioma Victim Awarded $8 Million

Leesburg, FL: It’s been some time since we’ve heard about an Asbestos lawsuit from smoking. Nonetheless, a recent jury award to a plaintiff who claims to have smoked a particular brand of cigarettes from 1952 to 1956 burdened the Lorillard Tobacco Company with a major portion of fault.
Mesothelioma Victim Awarded  Million


The plaintiff was awarded a total of $8 million.

Lorillard was the manufacturer of Kent brand cigarettes. While there have been prior lawsuits centered on the addictive qualities of cigarettes, this most recent lawsuit is unique in that addiction was never a factor. Rather, from 1952 to 1956, it was alleged that Lorillard manufactured a version of its Kent brand with filters containing asbestos fibers.

Plaintiff Richard Delisle of Leesburg claimed that the Kent brand of cigarettes he smoked as a teenager in the early-to-mid 1950s contributed to a July 2012 diagnosis of asbestos mesothelioma.

Most asbestos claims revolve around industrial settings, and the Delisle case was no different in that the plaintiff also worked for a Massachusetts-based paper mill in the early 1960s as a pipe fitter. The gaskets he handled as part of his job were alleged to contain asbestos.

However, an asbestos finding against a tobacco company is considered rare. In this case, according to court records, Lorillard was assessed 22 percent of the burden of fault. The manufacturer of the asbestosis-causing filter, Hollingsworth & Vose Company, was similarly assessed fault at 22 percent. However, Hollingsworth & Vose escaped the burden to fund that liability by way of a joint venture indemnity agreement between the filter manufacturer and Lorillard that ultimately shifted the liability to Lorillard, resulting in a combined burden of fault at 44 percent, or $3.52 million, for the tobacco company.

The award has been described as the largest award against a tobacco company and cigarette manufacturer with regard to an asbestosis claim from smoking.

Crane Co., the paper mill at which Delisle worked as a pipe fitter, was assessed fault at 16 percent, with the remaining 40 percent assessed to various other defendants in the asbestos cancer case.

The plaintiff, who is now 74, was not assessed any fault in the case. Just a young man with a smoking habit akin to scores of smokers in an era where even medical doctors advocated for the pleasure. As for his time as a pipe fitter, the plaintiff would claim that he was not made aware of any health hazard related to potential asbestos injury.

Asbestos fibers are a known carcinogen, and are at their most dangerous when they are ingested into the lungs. There, they tend to lay dormant for decades, until Mesothelioma suddenly appears seemingly out of the blue. Mesothelioma, asbestosis and asbestos cancer are almost exclusively linked to exposure to asbestos fibers, often decades prior to a diagnosis.

The asbestosis compensation verdict was handed down by a jury in Broward County, Florida, last month. It is not known if the defendants plan to appeal the ruling.

The case is Richard Delisle, et al. v. Lorillard Tobacco Company, et al. Case No. CACE 12025722. The verdict was delivered September 19 at the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida.

Court Approves $43 Million Montana Asbestos Settlement

A Montana judge has approved a $43 million settlement for people sickened by exposure toasbestos from a mine, with a large part of that amount to be paid by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, court documents show.

$43 Million Settlement for Residents

The settlement resolves a lawsuit filed against Montana over asbestos exposure at a W.R. Grace mine. Former miners and their families had accused the state of failing to properly oversee the mine or warn workers of dangers there.

The mine in Libby, Montana, produced vermiculite, used for home insulation, potting soil conditioner and absorbent packing material.
More than 70 percent of the vermiculite used in the country over eight decades camefromLibby — and it was all contaminated by asbestos deposits in the same mine, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Miners originally sued W.R. Grace over their exposure to asbestos, but after the company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2001 the workers sued the state for failing to adequately protect them, according to court documents.
About 1,400 people will receive payouts from the settlement approved Sept. 8 by MontanaDistrict Court Judge Jeffrey M. Sherlock, ending a decade-long legal battle.

The deal ends numerous cases and claims against Montana “but expressly reserves their claims against all other responsible parties,” according to the agreement.



Many of the victims of asbestos exposure from the Libby mine are now over 65, and others have since died of asbestos-related diseases such as asbestosis and cancers likemesothelioma, records show.

Because of the decades-long latency associated with asbestos-related diseases, people continue to be diagnosed decades after the mine closed, according to federal health officials.

Montana officials conducted inspections of the mine in the 1950s and later years, but despite knowing the risk to miners from asbestos dust, the state did not adequately warnworkers of those dangers, the Montana Supreme Court found in 2004.

To cover the $43 million settlement, the state of Montana is using $26.8 million out of its self-insurance fund.

Montana’s insurers, National Indemnity, Berkshire’s reinsurance unit, and MontanaInsurance Guaranty Association will pay $16.1 million and $100,000 respectively, according to court documents.

Warren Buffet’s Berkshire has been active in taking over asbestos obligations frominsurance companies in exchange for huge up-front premiums.

Payments for victims range from $500 to nearly $61,000 each, legal records show.


In a separate order on Sept. 8, Sherlock ordered one-third — or $14.3 million — to be paid out of the $43 million to attorneys for the victims, who worked on contingency.

The W.R. Grace mine in Libby closed in 1990.

In 2008, the company agreed to set up a trust fund to pay victims’ health claims.

Attorneys for the victims and for Montana did not respond to requests for comment.

Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settles for $2.1 Million for New Jersey Construction Worker

A 48-year-old New Jersey (NJ) union construction worker, who had his left lung removed after he was diagnosed with occupational mesothelioma cancer, received a $2.1 million settlement from a lawsuit he filed against the manufacturers of the asbestos construction products that eventually led to his death.

$2.1 Million Settlement



The New Jersey law office of Weitz & Luxenberg negotiated the settlement on behalf of theworker’s surviving family – his wife and two children. According to his lawyer: “Almost every construction product used before the 1980s contained asbestos. Back then, manufacturers deliberately omitted health care warnings, and employers rarely provided workers with equipment to protect them against the fatal diseases asbestos causes.”

The construction worker joined his local New Jersey pipefitters’ union as an apprentice in 1978, straight out of high school. Thirty years later he was dead from mesothelioma – the signature asbestos-related disease that claims the lives of hundreds of retired construction workers every year due to the unbridled use of toxic asbestos materials in the U.S. construction industry.

“The only time I started seeing safety masks on the job was about the late 80s,” the construction worker testified during his deposition. “That’s when they started offering me them, by saying, ‘It's dusty, you know. You’re hammering and drilling in the ceilings. It's coming down in your face, put the mask on.’ ”

He died exactly two weeks after the deposition, leaving behind a wife and two sons, aged 8 and 10.

Asbestos is no longer mined in the United States, but it is still imported and used in construction. Websites still sell asbestos-made products to industry contractors. With the enactment of federal regulations to protect workers against occupational asbestos exposure, new construction work is no longer as risky as it used to be.



But renovation work on old buildings still holds certain perils. That’s because large amounts of asbestos materials remain deeply embedded in the infrastructure of most buildings built before 1980. Toxic asbestos exposure occurs when workers disturb these materials inadvertently during renovation and demolition activities.

Most cases of mesothelioma are diagnosed 20 to 40 years after a job-related asbestosexposure. That’s why, despite today’s regulatory protections, researchers at the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta predict the number of cases of mesothelioma will peak this year in the United States. Currently, some 3,000 cases of mesothelioma are diagnosed in the country every year.

Record $190M Awarded in Asbestos Lawsuit

A good asbestos verdict associated with $190 mil continues to be granted inside a lawsuit through 5 men who were subjected to asbestos-tainted companies products throughout their work opportunities as steamfitters, plumbers, plus building employees.

The panel of recent Supreme Courtroom jurors discovered the two accused businesses experienced served negligently plus carelessly, after that rendering the verdict really worth an overall total associated with $190 mil, the biggest combined asbestos verdict within New York background. It really is believed that this $60 mil person quantities 2 from the men obtained would be the biggest person amounts granted inside a New York asbestos situation.


Daniel Blouin, a lawyer along with Weitz and Luxenberg, the particular company symbolizing the particular injured parties, said he great group undertaken the situation simply by informing the particular court a tale associated with 5 men just who worked honest work opportunities for many years simply to be paid back along with immense struggling. “We wanted to display the particular court the particular sadness our customers had been and so are going through, ” Blouin said. “And not only in physical form yet mentally. When you are subjected to asbestos plus create mesothelioma, you understand your own destiny. It is a good unbearably heavy problem. ”

Attorneys for the injured parties informed the particular court presently there was not a sum they could provide the men that might be unreasonable. The particular defendants in this case exposed a large number of women and men to some awfully toxic element. Chances are the businesses required the calculated danger within doing this. That will is not the financial debt which can be paid back, the particular lawyers said.

The particular court, coming back the verdict on four p. m. upon July twenty three, discovered each defendants – boiler businesses Cleaver Brooks plus Burnham – at fault within getting did not alert concerning the risks from the asbestos utilized in reference to their products. The particular verdict said each businesses experienced served along with careless overlook for the purpose of human lifetime.



All 5 from the injured parties had been trades-people from your tri-state region.

1 guy, through Toms River, NJ-NEW JERSEY, worked within the 50s plus sixties like a pipefitter within the Brooklyn Navy blue Yard. He was subjected to asbestos every day whilst fitted pipes into the salt-water distilling systems on-board plane carriers such as the USS Constellation plus USS Self-reliance.

Another, through Oyster These types of, NY, worked for almost 3 decades like a plumber, handling dozens of various kinds of items polluted along with asbestos.

A third, associated with Center Village, NY, seemed to be subjected to asbestos working like a plumber within Brooklyn, A queen, plus Rockland Company.

Another guy, through Howard Seaside, NY, was subjected to asbestos at work like a artist plus building employee. He was associated with the particular elimination plus demolition associated with central heating boiler that contains asbestos-laden components.

The final customer, through Kent, CN, furthermore worked with central heating boiler plus boiler components in the course of their work like a steamfitter.

All 5 men created mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure. 3 have passed away associated with problems associated with the condition.

$2.86 Million Settlement Awarded in Asbestos Lawsuit

Within Delaware court offers granted the $2MIL. towards the category of Erina Galliher, exactly who passed away through asbestos mesothelioma. The particular legal action has been submitted towards RT Vanderbilt Within lso are Asbestos Lawsuit Erina Galliher, Number 10C-10-315 (Del. Extremely. Computertomografie., Brand new Fortress Town. ). The particular arrangement could be the biggest asbestos judgement towards just one accused within Delaware within more than a 10 years.



Erina Galliher, associated with Mansfield, Kansas, has been identified as having pleuralmesothelioma within Aug the year 2010. This individual passed away several weeks afterwards Feb three or more, last year when justin was sixty two. Whilst operating fromMotorised hoist Domestic plumbing Fittings Stock for almost 4 decades, Galliher utilized the talcum powder natural powder polluted along with asbestos materials in order to dirt big conforms associated with basins, bath tubs along with other ceramic fittings. The particularasbestos materials originated from the my own within Gouverneur, NEW YORK, possessed plus managed simply by RT Vanderbilt Business, Incorporation.

Professional accounts throughout the test connected Galliher’s contact with talcum powder dirt that contains asbestos materials. RT Vanderbilt failed to listing the appropriate basic safety caution at the talcum powder natural powder.


Drywaller Awarded $26.6M in Asbestos MesotheliomaLawsuit

San Pedro, Cali: A particular asbestos mesothelioma verdict was achieve in March in the matter of Michael Sutherland, an ex drywaller clinically determined to have mesothelioma, the cancer brought on by asbestos. The L.A. Superior Court that heard the situation returned its judgement awarding $26 million to the victim.

Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit For $26.6M

Mike sayd that he performed as a drywaller in north San Diego County all the way back from1967, while still was attending High School, throughout 1993. Mike worked at numerous residential and business jobsites throughout the construction “boom” which occurred in northern county during the 1970s, at that time the cancer-causing asbestos was found in many construction items including joint substance, fire-rated drywall, stucco, roofing andasbestos concrete pipe.




“With all of the trades taking care of top of each one other looking to finish one work and begin the next, it absolutely was always dusty”.

The Sutherlands’ lawsuit was submitted on June 20, 2012. Over 31 defendants were called in the case. Thesettlements were achieved with numerous defendants just before trial. Stucco company, Highland Stucco plus Lime Products, the sole left over defendant at the trial, argued that various other corporations and even Sutherland himself was responsible for his direct exposure to asbestos. Nevertheless the jury eventually assessed fault on Highland because of its role in disclosing Mr. Sutherland along with other members from the public to the dangerous products.

We were surprised to find out at trial exactly how much asbestos is at stucco,” Mr Sutherland stated, “even although I rarely have worked with all the stuff, I had been exposed to dirt when the plastic bags were dumped within large mixers so when we needed to scrape off parts of over-spray into the houses through windows plus doors.”

Mr Sutherland is grateful to the jury’s award as well as the effort of his genuine team, but might gladly trade all of it for the yield of his wellness. Prior to his particular diagnosis in June 2012, Mike loved his job and realy had no plans for retiring. He additionally continued to engage his life-long love for surfing.

Construction Worker Settles Asbestos Lawsuit for $7.5M

Construction Worker Settles Asbestos Lawsuit for $7.5M

Los Angeles, CA: A construction worker who developed a highly aggressive cancer after hisexposure to asbestos, has resolved his asbestos lawsuit against the defendant companies for $7.5 million prior to trial. The plaintiff brought suit against several of the companies that manufactured the materials. The defendants severally denied liability.

In the 1970s and 1980s, the plaintiff was a construction worker helping install underground water and sewer lines beneath the Sacramento Valley city of Chico. His job involved working with pipes made from a concrete-asbestoscompound, which he would cut with a gasoline-powered saw. The cutting generated an enormous amount of cement-asbestos dust, which left the plaintiff covered head to toe by the end of the day. The plaintiff was later diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma, an aggressive form of cancer, also rare except where attributable to asbestos exposure.

The plaintiff filed suit in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, seeking damages on a defective product liability action. The plaintiff sought recovery of medical expenses, lost wages, and non-economic recovery. The defendants named were several companies whomanufactured, sold or delivered the asbestos-containing pipes the plaintiff worked with, including Parex USA, Westburne Supply, John K. Bice Co., Los Angeles Rubber, Hajoca Corp., Hanson Permanente Cement, Keenan, Properties, J-M Manufacturing, Certainteed Corp., Ferguson Enterprises, Grinnell Corp., Amcord, Ameron International and Calportland.

Chevron to Pay $40M in Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit



Denver, CO: A $40 million settlement has been reached in an environmental class action brought by northern Colorado landowners against Chevron Corp. The lawsuit alleged asbestos contamination to the land.

The settlement, reached late in January, will see Chevron pay $32.5million in cash to the landowners in the class. It will also pay $7.5million for asbestos cleanup and testing.



$8M Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settlement Awarded to Handyman

Los Angeles, CA: A 68-year old man who worked as a painter and handyman from the early 1960s until his diagnosis of asbestos mesothelioma has been awarded $8,465,738 in settlement of his asbestos lawsuit.



In the lawsuit, the plaintiff alleged his exposure to asbestos resulted from working with asbestos-containing products manufactured and supplied by the defendants, Union Carbide and CalPortland. Specifically, the lawsuit claimed that the joint compound and the plastic cement the plaintiff worked with contained asbestos.

Recently diagnosed with pleural malignant asbestos mesothelioma, the plaintiff subsequently underwent an extrapleural pneumonectomy. He and his wife brought suit against the various defendants alleging that the defendants were negligent in failing to warn of the dangers ofasbestos contained in their products or sold to others to place in their products.

Defendants Were Responsible & Order to Pay $80 Million

At the conclusion of the 37-day trial the jury returned its verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants. The jury determined that defendants CalPortland and Union Carbide were responsible.

Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts

It is important to briefly mention that mesothelioma is a statistically rare form of cancer caused by persistent exposure to asbestos. They are cataloged as a fiber used in automotive repairs, shipbuilding and the construction industry. As you may already know, Mesotheliomasettlements are, statistically speaking the result most often found when you present a claim of that type. The amounts vary in accord to many factors and I will mention the most important ones next:

- Lost wages.

- Financial costs of medical expenses.

- Mental and physical distress.

- Accumulated bills of different types.

- The claimant’s case strength.

The aforementioned facts are based on statistical research about Mesothelioma Settlements, which are usually private but sometimes this data is shown to the public eye by socially responsible media and transparency advocates. The financial results of these settlements range from a few thousand dollars to many millions of dollars since each case is considered as unique.

The victims often develop the disease many decades after their exposure which is why manyMesothelioma settlements are not reached due to premature death and the lack of knowledge of those affected by this particular form of cancer. Many companies neglect the health of their workers in spite of asbestos regulation since the 1970’s which is why they must pay, as stipulated by law, the financial compensation the affected individuals need to deal with the suffering and pain provoked by this premature form of cancer.

Due to this information and facts a new question arises: who is liable for the damaging effects of careless health measures when it comes to handling asbestos? There are many possibilities and I’ll present a list including the most common scenarios:

- Insurance companies.

- Asbestos manufacturers.

- Asbestos companies with installation functions.

- Asbestos victim’s trust funds assuming liability for a particular company’s wrongdoings.

As you can see, there are many elements involved in Mesothelioma Settlements and a careful analysis of a particular situation is the best way to assure justice prevails.


Mesothelioma Settlement

It's virtually impossible to predict how much money will be involved in the settlement of amesothelioma claim without knowing specific details of the claim and the medical history of the plaintiff. But history has shown that an overwhelming majority of the cases never reach the courtroom. Cases usually end in a settlement.

Settlement amounts are often tied to the cost of medical expenses, lost wages, physical and mental distress and bills that accumulate from moving forward with an asbestos-related illness. Of course, they're also linked to the strength of a plaintiff's case, which brings into play the disease diagnosis, the health condition of the plaintiff (or loved one) and the degree of perceived liability on the part of the defendant(s).

For example:
  • A Buchanan County (Missouri) Circuit Court Judge approved a settlement in 2011 worth $10 million to Nancy Lopez, a Jackson County courthouse employee, who was exposed to the asbestos during a renovation project done by U.S. Engineering Company.
  • A Montana judge in 2011 approved a $43 million settlement in Libby, Montana. But because the settlement covered more than 1,300 miners and their families, individual settlements ranged from only $500 to $61,000.
  • The family of a New Jersey construction worker received a $2.1 million settlement after he died of mesothelioma, but a Navy veteran received settlements totally $461,000 after he developed asbestos-related lung cancer.
  • A boilermaker in New York received a $3.7 million settlement after developing lung cancer from asbestos exposure, while a building maintenance worker received a $2million settlement after developing mesothelioma.

Exact settlement figures are usually considered private and claimants are often bound by a confidentially agreement, although from time to time settlement amounts to reach the public eye. Those amounts can range from a few thousand dollars to millions of dollars.

According to a recent Mealey's Litigation Report, the average mesothelioma trial award is an estimated $2.4 million. The average mesothelioma settlement is between $1 million and $1.4 million and typically is paid from multiple defendants. Some are considerably higher, others significantly lower. No two cases are alike.

Here are 10 other publicized settlements in mesothelioma cases:

  • A Pearl Harbor shipyard worker who developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure received a $9.8 million settlement.
  • A construction worker who died in his 40's from asbestos exposure received a $9.1million settlement.
  • A Navy veteran who developed mesothelioma received a $5.8 million settlement.
  • A 72-year-old Navy veteran received a $4 million settlement after being diagnosed with mesothelioma.
  • A retired New York boilermaker received a $3,797,083 settlement after forming lung cancer from asbestos exposure.
  • A building maintenance worker received a $2 million settlement after developing mesothelioma.
  • A Navy submarine worker who developed mesothelioma received a $1.7 million settlement.
  • The widow of a Navy veteran who developed mesothelioma received a $1.3million settlement.
  • A New Jersey construction worker received a $2.1 million settlement after dying of mesothelioma.
  • A Navy veteran received settlements totaling $461,000 after developing asbestos-related lung cancer.