mesothelioma settlement amounts mesothelioma settlements firm law mesothelioma mesothelioma law firms average mesothelioma settlement amount mesothelioma lawsuits settlements mesothelioma lawsuit mesothelioma lawsuits mesothelioma lawyer california mesothelioma lawyer san diego mesothelioma lawyer houston mesothelioma lawyer lawyers for mesothelioma
Showing posts with label Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts. Show all posts

Mesothelioma Victim Awarded $8 Million

Leesburg, FL: It’s been some time since we’ve heard about an Asbestos lawsuit from smoking. Nonetheless, a recent jury award to a plaintiff who claims to have smoked a particular brand of cigarettes from 1952 to 1956 burdened the Lorillard Tobacco Company with a major portion of fault.
Mesothelioma Victim Awarded  Million


The plaintiff was awarded a total of $8 million.

Lorillard was the manufacturer of Kent brand cigarettes. While there have been prior lawsuits centered on the addictive qualities of cigarettes, this most recent lawsuit is unique in that addiction was never a factor. Rather, from 1952 to 1956, it was alleged that Lorillard manufactured a version of its Kent brand with filters containing asbestos fibers.

Plaintiff Richard Delisle of Leesburg claimed that the Kent brand of cigarettes he smoked as a teenager in the early-to-mid 1950s contributed to a July 2012 diagnosis of asbestos mesothelioma.

Most asbestos claims revolve around industrial settings, and the Delisle case was no different in that the plaintiff also worked for a Massachusetts-based paper mill in the early 1960s as a pipe fitter. The gaskets he handled as part of his job were alleged to contain asbestos.

However, an asbestos finding against a tobacco company is considered rare. In this case, according to court records, Lorillard was assessed 22 percent of the burden of fault. The manufacturer of the asbestosis-causing filter, Hollingsworth & Vose Company, was similarly assessed fault at 22 percent. However, Hollingsworth & Vose escaped the burden to fund that liability by way of a joint venture indemnity agreement between the filter manufacturer and Lorillard that ultimately shifted the liability to Lorillard, resulting in a combined burden of fault at 44 percent, or $3.52 million, for the tobacco company.

The award has been described as the largest award against a tobacco company and cigarette manufacturer with regard to an asbestosis claim from smoking.

Crane Co., the paper mill at which Delisle worked as a pipe fitter, was assessed fault at 16 percent, with the remaining 40 percent assessed to various other defendants in the asbestos cancer case.

The plaintiff, who is now 74, was not assessed any fault in the case. Just a young man with a smoking habit akin to scores of smokers in an era where even medical doctors advocated for the pleasure. As for his time as a pipe fitter, the plaintiff would claim that he was not made aware of any health hazard related to potential asbestos injury.

Asbestos fibers are a known carcinogen, and are at their most dangerous when they are ingested into the lungs. There, they tend to lay dormant for decades, until Mesothelioma suddenly appears seemingly out of the blue. Mesothelioma, asbestosis and asbestos cancer are almost exclusively linked to exposure to asbestos fibers, often decades prior to a diagnosis.

The asbestosis compensation verdict was handed down by a jury in Broward County, Florida, last month. It is not known if the defendants plan to appeal the ruling.

The case is Richard Delisle, et al. v. Lorillard Tobacco Company, et al. Case No. CACE 12025722. The verdict was delivered September 19 at the 17th Judicial Circuit of Florida.

$1.5M Awarded to Architect with Mesothelioma

May 2013, an excellent architect whose dad was an immigrant to the US coming from Mexico, was clinically diagnosed with asbestos mesothelioma. Immediately after a 4 week trial, a L.A Jury delivered a judgment on July 1 in favor of the architect, presenting him a verdict against Elementis Chemicals, Inc. and Union Carbide Corporation.

1.5$M Mesothelioma Settlements Amounts




Mr. Marteney’s asbestos illness stemmed coming from his direct exposure to workers that used asbestos-containing manufacturing products and automotive components. Union Carbide has been a provider of asbestos fiber in addition to Elementis appeared to be the supplier of Union Carbide’s asbestos all over the West Coast.

Mr. Marteney’s asbestos exposure to it goes way back to his childhood, as soon as his father took the man out of the school and made him operate in his dad’s car shop, in which he handled these kinds of toxic components without any know-how of their danger.

Without having an education and also no knowledge of the man his asbestos exposure, Mr. Marteney enrolled in the military, started a household, and later turned out to be an beginner architect.

At some point Mr. Marteney came back to school and then built a career as a well-liked architect, planning homes for the rich people in Beverly Hills. Unconsciously, all this hard work subjected him to products that contain asbestos products that would definitely later trigger the cancer which would destroy his well-deserved pension. Mr. Marteney is now undergoing therapy for his mesothelioma. He now lives in San Marino, together with his wife.


Chevron to Pay $40M in Asbestos Class Action Lawsuit



Denver, CO: A $40 million settlement has been reached in an environmental class action brought by northern Colorado landowners against Chevron Corp. The lawsuit alleged asbestos contamination to the land.

The settlement, reached late in January, will see Chevron pay $32.5million in cash to the landowners in the class. It will also pay $7.5million for asbestos cleanup and testing.



Family of Deceased GM Worker Awarded $3M in Asbestos Lawsuit Settlement



Erie, PA: The family of a former employee at the GM Powertrain facility in the town of Tonawanda, who subsequently died of asbestos disease, has been awarded $3 million by the jury hearing the case.

Gerald Suttner, formerly of Tonawanda, worked at the GM facility repairing vales manufactured by Crane Co. The job involved removing asbestos gaskets, which created asbestos dust Suttner would have inhaled. He did this for 36 years,from 1964 to 1979, when he retired.

Diagnosed in October 2010, Mr. Suttner died just one year later, from pleural mesothelioma, a form of cancer that is caused by asbestos. He was 77.


During the trial, lawyers for the Suttner family called expert witnesses who testified that there is no such thing as safeasbestos exposure and assured the jury that Suttner’s exposure is what led to his diagnosis. The dangers of asbestoshave been known since the early 1900s, and they lawyers made the case that Crane was aware of these dangers since the 1930s. “But the company continued to use asbestos well into the late 1980s without placing warnings on its products,” the law firm’s statement reads.

During his retirement, Suttner helped his wife, Joann, care for their disabled daughter, and served as a volunteer for the Shriners Hospital in Erie, PA, driving children to and from the hospital.

$8M Asbestos Mesothelioma Lawsuit Settlement Awarded to Handyman

Los Angeles, CA: A 68-year old man who worked as a painter and handyman from the early 1960s until his diagnosis of asbestos mesothelioma has been awarded $8,465,738 in settlement of his asbestos lawsuit.



In the lawsuit, the plaintiff alleged his exposure to asbestos resulted from working with asbestos-containing products manufactured and supplied by the defendants, Union Carbide and CalPortland. Specifically, the lawsuit claimed that the joint compound and the plastic cement the plaintiff worked with contained asbestos.

Recently diagnosed with pleural malignant asbestos mesothelioma, the plaintiff subsequently underwent an extrapleural pneumonectomy. He and his wife brought suit against the various defendants alleging that the defendants were negligent in failing to warn of the dangers ofasbestos contained in their products or sold to others to place in their products.

Defendants Were Responsible & Order to Pay $80 Million

At the conclusion of the 37-day trial the jury returned its verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants. The jury determined that defendants CalPortland and Union Carbide were responsible.

Mesothelioma Settlement Amounts

It is important to briefly mention that mesothelioma is a statistically rare form of cancer caused by persistent exposure to asbestos. They are cataloged as a fiber used in automotive repairs, shipbuilding and the construction industry. As you may already know, Mesotheliomasettlements are, statistically speaking the result most often found when you present a claim of that type. The amounts vary in accord to many factors and I will mention the most important ones next:

- Lost wages.

- Financial costs of medical expenses.

- Mental and physical distress.

- Accumulated bills of different types.

- The claimant’s case strength.

The aforementioned facts are based on statistical research about Mesothelioma Settlements, which are usually private but sometimes this data is shown to the public eye by socially responsible media and transparency advocates. The financial results of these settlements range from a few thousand dollars to many millions of dollars since each case is considered as unique.

The victims often develop the disease many decades after their exposure which is why manyMesothelioma settlements are not reached due to premature death and the lack of knowledge of those affected by this particular form of cancer. Many companies neglect the health of their workers in spite of asbestos regulation since the 1970’s which is why they must pay, as stipulated by law, the financial compensation the affected individuals need to deal with the suffering and pain provoked by this premature form of cancer.

Due to this information and facts a new question arises: who is liable for the damaging effects of careless health measures when it comes to handling asbestos? There are many possibilities and I’ll present a list including the most common scenarios:

- Insurance companies.

- Asbestos manufacturers.

- Asbestos companies with installation functions.

- Asbestos victim’s trust funds assuming liability for a particular company’s wrongdoings.

As you can see, there are many elements involved in Mesothelioma Settlements and a careful analysis of a particular situation is the best way to assure justice prevails.


Mesothelioma Settlement

It's virtually impossible to predict how much money will be involved in the settlement of amesothelioma claim without knowing specific details of the claim and the medical history of the plaintiff. But history has shown that an overwhelming majority of the cases never reach the courtroom. Cases usually end in a settlement.

Settlement amounts are often tied to the cost of medical expenses, lost wages, physical and mental distress and bills that accumulate from moving forward with an asbestos-related illness. Of course, they're also linked to the strength of a plaintiff's case, which brings into play the disease diagnosis, the health condition of the plaintiff (or loved one) and the degree of perceived liability on the part of the defendant(s).

For example:
  • A Buchanan County (Missouri) Circuit Court Judge approved a settlement in 2011 worth $10 million to Nancy Lopez, a Jackson County courthouse employee, who was exposed to the asbestos during a renovation project done by U.S. Engineering Company.
  • A Montana judge in 2011 approved a $43 million settlement in Libby, Montana. But because the settlement covered more than 1,300 miners and their families, individual settlements ranged from only $500 to $61,000.
  • The family of a New Jersey construction worker received a $2.1 million settlement after he died of mesothelioma, but a Navy veteran received settlements totally $461,000 after he developed asbestos-related lung cancer.
  • A boilermaker in New York received a $3.7 million settlement after developing lung cancer from asbestos exposure, while a building maintenance worker received a $2million settlement after developing mesothelioma.

Exact settlement figures are usually considered private and claimants are often bound by a confidentially agreement, although from time to time settlement amounts to reach the public eye. Those amounts can range from a few thousand dollars to millions of dollars.

According to a recent Mealey's Litigation Report, the average mesothelioma trial award is an estimated $2.4 million. The average mesothelioma settlement is between $1 million and $1.4 million and typically is paid from multiple defendants. Some are considerably higher, others significantly lower. No two cases are alike.

Here are 10 other publicized settlements in mesothelioma cases:

  • A Pearl Harbor shipyard worker who developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure received a $9.8 million settlement.
  • A construction worker who died in his 40's from asbestos exposure received a $9.1million settlement.
  • A Navy veteran who developed mesothelioma received a $5.8 million settlement.
  • A 72-year-old Navy veteran received a $4 million settlement after being diagnosed with mesothelioma.
  • A retired New York boilermaker received a $3,797,083 settlement after forming lung cancer from asbestos exposure.
  • A building maintenance worker received a $2 million settlement after developing mesothelioma.
  • A Navy submarine worker who developed mesothelioma received a $1.7 million settlement.
  • The widow of a Navy veteran who developed mesothelioma received a $1.3million settlement.
  • A New Jersey construction worker received a $2.1 million settlement after dying of mesothelioma.
  • A Navy veteran received settlements totaling $461,000 after developing asbestos-related lung cancer.